PENERIMAAN E-LEARNING DENGAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL PADA UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA

Penulis

  • Merlin Apriliyanti Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Ilham Fakultas Sains Dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59004/metta.v1i3.162

Kata Kunci:

E-Learning, TAM, Management, UTAUT, Higher Education

Abstrak

The existence of information technology and information systems has changed many organizations around the world. Information technology promises significant potential for organizations to improve operational capabilities. The benefits that e-learning brings are more flexible learning opportunities, saving space and time, facilitating access to education for the community, enriching learning materials, and facilitating the learning process. This study aims to evaluate, to convince, to know the extent of the influence of model technology acceptance on the use of E-Learning. The population in this study is the State Islamic Religious University UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, which is located in the city of Surabaya. the minimum number of samples in this study was 170 lecturers and students. The sampling technique in this research is sampling based on the research population using the Proportional Random Sampling technique. Researchers use structural equation modeling in analytical techniques, considering that SEM has the ability to combine measurement models with structural models simultaneously and efficiently. The results of the statistical analysis of the application of the TAM and UTAUT models using the AMOS software found several factors including Social Influence, Facilitating Condition, Perceived Usefulness, and Perceived Ease of Use directly affect Use Behavior and empirically proven to affect the behavior of lecturers and students in using e-learning for online learning activities at UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Referensi

Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein, (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,

Ajzen,(1985), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB).

Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50:2), 179-211.

Aziz Alrafi (2009), Information System Adoption : A Study of The Technology Acceptance Model.

Benbasat, Izak and Dexter, Albert. (1986). "An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Color and Graphical Information Presentation Under Varying Time Constraints,"MIS Quarterly, (10: 1).

Cronbach, L.J. (1951) ‘Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests’, Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Davis, F. D. (1986), A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End User Information System: Theory and Result “Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan” School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Davis, F. D., & Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use , and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance Of Computer Technology A Comparison Of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2632151

Davis, F.D. (1993). User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perception and Behavioral Impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies. 38 (3): 475-487.

DeLone, W. H. & McLean, E. R (2003) The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success : A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35, 982-1003.

Ferdinand, A. (2005), Structural Equation Modeling Dalam Penelitian Manajemen: Aplikasi Model-Model Rumit Dalam Penelitian Untuk Tesis Magister Dan Disertasi Doktor, Edisi 3, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intentions, and Behavior : An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesely, Boston MA. Glossary of E-Learning Terms (2001), learnframe.com.

Hair, Jr et.al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed). United States : Pearson

Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2011), “PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 139-151.

Hair Jr, J. E., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (Eight edition). Cengage Learning EMEA: United Kingdom.

Hassan M. Selim, (2007) : Critical success factors for E-Learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Comput. Educ. 49(2): 396-4132005.

Koran, Jaya Kumar C. (2002), Aplikasi E-Learning dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran di Sekolah Malaysia. (8 November 2002).

Lewis, William, Ritu Agarwal dan V Sambamurthy (2003), Sourche of Influence on Beliefs About Information Technology Use : An Empirica Study of Knowledge Worker, MIS Quarterly Vol 27 No. 4.

Lewis, C. C., Fretwell, C. E., Ryan, J., & Parham, J. B. (2013). Faculty use of established and emerging technologies in higher education: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology perspective. International Journal of Higher Education, 2(2), 22-34.

Marchewka, J., Liu, C., & Kostiwa, K. (2007). An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software. Communications of the IIMA, 7(2), 93.

Moore, G., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation. Information System Research (2:3), 192-222.

Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. (1996) ‘Integrating Diffusion of Innovations and Theory of Reasoned Action Models to Predict Utilization of Information Technology by End-Users’, in Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology, Kautz, K. & Pries-Hege, J. (eds.), London, Chapman and Hall.

Ong, C. S., Lai, J. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2004). Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous E-Learning systems in high-tech companies. Information and Management, 41(6), 795–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.012

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding students’ behavioral intention to use E-Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1109/IIAI-AAI.2014.14

Park, S. Y., Nam, M. W., & Cha, S. B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01229.x

Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. kuei. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on E-Learning use. Computers and Education, 47(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007

Prasetyo, B. H., & Anubhakti, D. (2011). Kajian Penerimaan Sistem E-Learning dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan UTAUT Studi Kasus Fakultas Teknologi Informasi Universitas Budi Luhur. Issn?: 1693- 9166, 8(2), 45–47.

Rosenberg, Marc. J. (2001). E-Learning : Strategies For Delivering Knowledge In The Digital Age. USA : McGraw-Hill Companies.

Rosenberg. Marc J. (2006). Beyond E-Learning – Approaches and Technologies to Enhance Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Performance. Pteiffer. Amerika.

Straub, D., Limayem, M & Karahanna-Evaristo, E (1995) Measuring System Usage : Implication for IS theory Testing. Management Science, 41, 1328-1342.

Subhan, M. (2007). Pengaruh Variable Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, dan Psychological Attachment Terhadap Pemanfaatan teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta. UGM.

Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.CV

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Taylor, R. S & Tood, P. (1995), Assessing IT Usage : The role of Prior Experience MIS Quarterly, 561-570.

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995a). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995b). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19, 561–570.

Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers and Education, 52(2), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006

Thompson, Ronald L., (1994). Higgins, christopher A., dan Howwel, Jane M., “Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing A Conceptual Model,”Journal of Management Information systems.

Tagoe, M. (2012). Students ’ perceptions on incorporating E-Learning into teaching and learning at the University of Ghana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 8(1), 91–103.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test*. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x

Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000). “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, vol.46, no.2, pp. 186-204,

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, F.D., dan Davis, G.B. (2003). Penerimaan Pengguna Teknologi Informasi: Toward a Unified View, MIS Quarterly, 27, 2003, p. 425-478.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273-315. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkantesh, Viswanath, James Y. L. Thong, and Xin Xu. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology : Extending The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quartely Vol. 36 No.1.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2022-10-01

Cara Mengutip

Apriliyanti, M., & Ilham. (2022). PENERIMAAN E-LEARNING DENGAN TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL PADA UIN SUNAN AMPEL SURABAYA. Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Ilmu, 1(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.59004/metta.v1i3.162

Terbitan

Bagian

Artikel

Artikel paling banyak dibaca berdasarkan penulis yang sama