ANALISIS PUTUSAN HUKUMAN MATI MENURUT MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 2-3/PUU-V/2007 DAN FIQIH SIYASAH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59004/metta.v1i3.171Kata Kunci:
Analysis, Decision, Death Penalty, Constitutional Court, Fiqh SiyasahAbstrak
The occurrence of pros and cons of the existence of the death penalty in Indonesia for narcotics dealers as a criminal act of capital punishment in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007, thus the author wants to conduct research related to the Analysis of the Death Penalty Decision According to the Constitutional Court Number 2- 3/PUU-V/2007 and Fiqh Siyasah. The purpose of this study was to determine the results of the analysis of the death penalty decision according to the Constitutional Court Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007, and to understand the results of the analysis of the death penalty decision from the perspective of Fiqh Siyasah. This research is a type of library research, where the data sources are obtained from literature searches such as journal articles, internet sites, books, legal materials (laws), and other research results relevant to this research topic. The results of the analysis of the Death Penalty Decision according to the Constitutional Court Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007 are the first, Decision Number 2-3/PUU-V/2007 which contains the death penalty moderation policy is in accordance with the theory of punishment, especially the integrative theory because the Indonesian legal system is a mixture of various legal systems, namely the Dutch legal system, the customary law system, and the Islamic legal system, so that determining a legal policy cannot be separated from these various legal systems, including the influence of international provisions. While the results of the Analysis of the Death Penalty Decision according to Fiqh Siyasah is Islamic law clearly states that the death penalty is a must in the crime of murder. The decision regarding the death penalty is left to each country. In this case, western countries as the originators of the idea of abolishing the death penalty do not impose their will to abolish the death penalty absolutely, including Indonesia.
Unduhan
Referensi
Gemala Dewi. 2005. Hukum Acara Perdata Peradilan Agama di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana,
Hermawan, I. M. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Bahasa Arab. Bandung: PT Remaja RosdaKarya.
Hutapea, B. 2016. Kontroversi Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jakarta Selatan: Percetakan Pohon Cahaya.
Roihan A. Rasyid, 2006. Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama (Jakarta: PT. Rajawali Press.
Sitabuana, T. H. 2020. Hukum Tatanegara Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.
Sudikno Mertokususmo. 1998. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty
Aireen, N. 2020. Analisis Disparitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. Bone: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam IAIN Bone.
Heryanti. 2018. Tinjauan Fiqh Siyasah Tentang Pelaksanaan Fungsi Bappeda dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan. Lampung: Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan.
Hilal, F. 2017. Fikih Siyasah. Makassar: Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin.
In, K. 2019. Disparitas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Kedudukan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah. Purwokerto: Fakultas Syariah IAIN Purwokerto.
Santi. 2020. Analisis Hukum Pidana Islam Terhadap Pidana Mati bagi Pengedar Narkoba. Pare: Fakultas Syariah dan Ilmu Hukum Islam IAIN PAREPARE.
Sholehah, N. A. 2021. Disparitas Pemidanaan dalam Putusan Hakim Terhadap Delik Penganiayaan Antara Oknum Polri dan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Yaniawati, R. P. 2020. Penelitian Studi Kepustakaan. FKIP UNPAS. Bandung.
Zerial, N. 2008. Decision No. 2-3/PUU-VI/2007 [2007] (Indonesian Constitutional Court). Australian International Law Journal, 14, 217- 226.
Zuraidah, M. 2021. Vonis Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Pasal 340 KUHP dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 1999 Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia. Banyuwangi: Universitas 17 Agustus 1945.
Anjari, W. 2020. Penerapan Pidana Mati terhadap Terpidana Kasus Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jilid 49 No. 4.
Khatibah. 2011. Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jurnal Iqra'.
Kristian. 2013. Jenis-Jenis Sanksi Pidana yang Dapat Diterapkan terhadap Korporasi. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan.
Mei Susanto, A. R. 2017. Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati. Jurnal Yudisial.
Nurgiansah, T. H. 2018. Pengembangan Kesadaran Hukum Berlalu Lintas Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Jurisprudensial dalam Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Yan David Bonitua, P. P. 2017. Sikap dan Pandangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Eksistensi Sanksi Pidana Mati di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal.
Yuni Septian, d. 2020. Analisis Kualitas Layanan Sistem Informasi Akademik Universitas Abdurrab Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Menggunakan Metode Sevqual. Jurnal Teknologi dan Open Source.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007. Diakses pada 22 Mei 2022. Retrieved from Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia: www.mkri.id.
Afriza, N. Tahap-tahap dalam Membuat Putusan. Retrieved from Pengadilan Agama Padang Kelas IA: pa-padang.go.id. Diakses pada 12 Agustus 2022.
Aris Kurniawan, 13 Pengertian Analisis Menurut Para Ahli, Tersedia: http://www.gurupendidikan.com/13-pengertian-analisis-menurut-para-ahli-didunia/, Diakses Pada Tanggal 16 Agustus 2022
Lim, I. Pengertian Perspektif Atau Sudut Pandang - Definisi Menurut Para Ahli. Retrieved from IDOCPUB: idoc.pub. Diakses pada 12 Agustus 2022
Surat Al-Ma'idah Ayat 45. Retrieved from TafsirQ.com: https://tafsirq.com. Diakses pada 12 Agustus 2022
