PERAN PERSEPSI DUKUNGAN ORGANISASIONAL DAN KEADILAN DISTRIBUTIF PADA KINERJA KELOMPOK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59004/metta.v1i3.195Kata Kunci:
Persepsi Dukungan Organisasi, keadilan distributif, kinerja kelompokAbstrak
Tujuan - Dalam beberapa tahun terakhir studi tentang keterlibatan organisasi semakin banyak dilakukan untuk mengetahui lebih jauh, dan lebih luas, baik variabel anteseden maupun variabel konsekuen, khususnya yang melibatkan individu sebagai objek penelitian, dan hanya sedikit penelitian yang melibatkan kelompok sebagai objek penelitian. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji model anteseden dan konsekuensi dari kinerja kelompok berdasarkan Teori Pertukaran Sosial. Desain/Metodologi/Pendekatan - Populasi penelitian ini adalah 113 program studi ilmu-ilmu sosial di perguruan tinggi swasta di Yogyakarta dan ada 105 program studi yang memenuhi syarat sebagai data. Sedangkan objek penelitian kelompok terdiri dari ketua dan sekretaris jurusan. Model penelitian menggunakan model sensus. Variabel independen meliputi persepsi dukungan organisasional dan keadilan distributif, serta variabel dependen yaitu kinerja kelompok. Temuan - Hasil menunjukkan bahwa persepsi dukungan organisasional dan keadilan distributif tidak berperan pada kinerja program studi ilmu-ilmu sosial di perguruan tinggi swasta di Yogyakarta. Orisinalitas - Masih ada peluang studi tentang kinerja kelompok, baik sebagai mediator maupun prediktor menggunakan objek data kelompok. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini tidak hanya menawarkan penggunaan data kelompok tetapi juga menyediakan variabel anteseden yang lebih luas dan konsekuensinya berdasarkan teori pertukaran sosial.
Unduhan
Referensi
M. M. Poloma, Sosiologi Kontemporer, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
R. West Richard and L. H. Turner. , Pengantar Teori Komunikasi: Analisis Dan Aplikasi. Buku 1 edis ke-3 Terjemahan Maria Natalia Damayanti Maer, Jakarta: Salemba Humanika, 2008.
A. M. Saks, "Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement, 21(7)," Journal of Managerial Psychology, pp. 600-619, 2006.
R. Wageman and J. R. Hackman, "A Theory of Team Coaching, 30(2)," Academy of Management Review, pp. 269-287, 2005.
M. A. Campion, G. J. Medsker and A. C. Higgs, "Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effetiveness : Implilcations For Designing Effective Work Groups, 46(4)," Personnel Psychology, pp. 823-842, 1993.
S. G. Cohen and D. E. Bailey, "What Makes Teams Work : Group Effectiveness Rresearch from The Shop Floor to The Executive Suite., 23(3)," Journal of Management, pp. 239-290, 1997.
J. R. Hackman, "The Design of Work Teams," pp. 314-342, 1987.
J. Macbryde and K. Mendibil, "Designing performance measurement systems for teams: Theory and practice, 41(8)," Management Decision, pp. 722-733, 2003.
J. Paauwe, D. Den Hartdog and P. Boselie, "Paauwe, J., Den Hartdog, D., & Boselie, P. 2004. Performance Management : A Model and Research Agenda. 53(4)," pp. 556-569, 2004.
G. S. Van Der Vegt and J. S. Bunderson, "Learning and Performance in Multidisciplinary Teams: The Importance of Collective Team Identification, 48(3)," Academy of Management Journal, pp. 532-547, 2005.
M. Van Woerkom and M. Croon, "The relationships Between Team Learning Activities and Team Performance, 38(5)," pp. 560-577, 2009.
A. M. Marks, E. J. Mathieu and J. Zaccaro, "A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes, 26(3)," The Academy of management Review, pp. 356-376, 2001.
R. M. Belbin, Management Teams: Why They Succeed Or Fail, London: Routledge., 2010.
B. Senior, "Team roles and team performance: Is there "really" a link? 70(3)," journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,, pp. 241-258, 1997.
L. Rhoades and R. Eisenberger, "Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature, 87(4)," Journal of Applied Psychology, pp. 698-714, 2002.
K. ArunKamar and R. Renugadevi, "Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement - A Hypothetical Approach. IOSR, 9(3)," Journal of Business and Management, pp. 52-57, 2013.
D. Friedman and H. Michael, "The Contribution of Rational Choice Theory to Macrosociological Research. Sociology Theory, 6(2).," pp. 201-218, 1988.
H. K. Tjahjono, "‘The configuration among social capital, distributive and procedural justice and its consequences to individual satisfaction’, Vol. 22, No. 1," International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, pp. 87-103, 2011.
M. Palupi and H. K. Tjahjono, " A Model of religiousity and organizational justice: the impact on commitment and dysfunctional behavior, Milan, Italy," Ibima Proceeding, pp. 1781-1790, 2016.
R. Folger and M. A. Konovsky, "Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions, 32(1)," Academy of Management Journal, pp. 115-130, 1989.
D. Tjosvold, M. Tang and M. A. West, "Reflexivity for Team Innovation in China., 29(5).," Group & Organization Management, pp. 540-559, 2002.
J. M. George, A. P. Brief, A. H. Butcher and K. E. Link, "Contact with AIDS patientsas a source of work-related distress: effects of organizational and social support. Acad Manage, 36(1)," pp. 157-171, 1993.
L. Rhoades, R. Eisenberger and S. Armeli, "Affective Commitment to the Organization: The Contribution of Perceived Organizational Support, 86(5)," Journal of Applied Psychology, pp. 825-836, 2001.
