The Role of Educational Leadership in Human Resource Management in Public Schools with the National Curriculum
Keywords:
Kepemimpinan Pendidikan, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Sekolah Negeri, Kurikulum Nasional, Pengelolaan Guru, Pengembangan profesionalismeAbstract
Educational leadership plays an important role in human resource management in public schools that implement the national curriculum. This article analyzes how effective leadership affects human resource management, especially in the context of managing teachers as the primary educators. Through a field study of several public schools, this article identifies the challenges faced in implementing the national curriculum as well as strategies that can be applied to improve the quality of teaching and teachers' skills. The findings show that leadership based on good human resource management can improve the quality of education, although major challenges such as lack of continuous training and limited funding remain. The study also suggests that public schools maximize the use of technology in teacher professional development and involve various stakeholders to achieve more optimal educational success.
Downloads
References
Buku
Armstrong, M. (2012). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. 12th edition. Kogan Page.
Dessler, G. (2017). Human Resource Management. 15th edition. Pearson Education.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Kurikulum 2013: Panduan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and Practice. 8th edition. SAGE Publications.
Bush, T., Bell, L., & Middlewood, D. (Eds.). (2019). Principles of educational leadership & management. SAGE Publications.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2020). Management (14th ed.). Pearson Education.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2005). Transformational leadership. Routledge.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (2015). The principalship: A reflective practice perspective (7th ed.). Pearson.
Jurnal
Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210379060
Fullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017961110453
Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed leadership. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737027002139
Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2018). The dark side of leadership and management in education: Can we escape? School Leadership & Management, 38(5), 475–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1509276
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Laporan dan Dokumen Kebijakan
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2020). Pedoman implementasi kurikulum nasional 2020. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
UNESCO. (2017). Educational leadership for the 21st century: Principles and practices. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). Leadership for the 21st century schools: Policy directions. OECD Publishing.
Artikel dan Sumber Digital
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. Retrieved from https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/
