Analysis of Bank Health Levels Using the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, and Capital (RGEC) Method for Sharia Commercial Banks Registered with the OJK for the Period 2019-2022
Case Study of Sharia Banking Companies Registered with the Financial Services Authority
Keywords:
Health Bank, Sharia Commercial Bank, RGEC MethodAbstract
The role of banks in today's society is so important, banks must be able to survive in every condition that occurs. Assessment of the Soundness Level of Sharia Commercial Banks with provisions for capital adequacy, asset quality, management quality, liquidity, profitability and solvency, as well as other aspects related to business and the obligation to carry out business activities in accordance with the precautionary principle. The main indicator used as the basis for bank health research is the financial reports of Islamic commercial banks which do not yet show the bank's overall financial condition. Then, risk management begins with the awareness that risk cannot be avoided or eliminated but is controlled by assessing the health level of Islamic commercial banks.
The aim of this research is to find out the health level of sharia commercial banks registered with the financial services authority (OJK) for the 2019-2022 period as measured using the RGEC method, and to find out the health level of sharia commercial banks. This type of research is descriptive quantitative with research subjects at Sharia Commercial Banks registered with the Financial Services Authority (OJK) for the period 2019 - 2022. The data in this research uses secondary data in the form of financial reports. The sampling technique uses purposive sampling. The analysis technique used is bank health analysis with a risk approach (Risk-based Bank Rating) with assessment coverage based on Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning and Capital (RGEC) factors.
The research results show that the health level of PT. Bank Aceh Syariah, for the 2019-2022 period as measured by the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, & Capital) as a whole is included in Composite Rank 1 (PK-1), reflecting the bank's condition which is generally "Very Healthy" , so it is considered very capable of facing significant negative assumptions from changes in business conditions and other external factors. Then PT. BPD Riau Kepri Syariah, and PT. Bank Muamalat Indonesia Tbk for the 2019-2022 period as measured using the RGEC method (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings, Capital) as a whole can be said to be included in Composite Rank 2 (PK-2), reflecting the condition of the bank which is generally "Healthy ”. The conclusion shows that the condition of the 3 Islamic commercial banks is that 1 bank is categorized as very healthy and 2 banks are categorized as healthy, but overall, the average percentage of the 3 Islamic commercial banks is in the "Very Healthy" category based on the bank health ratio calculation.
References
[1] Ardila, D., Andriana, I., & Ghasarma, R. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Perbankan Pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Al-Kharaj : Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 5(1), 1—15. https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v5i1.1091
[2] Astari, N. D., Hermawan, D., & Pakpahan, R. (2021). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Metode RGEC (Studi Kasus Pada PT Bank Mandiri (Persero), Tbk). Indonesian Journal of Economics and Management, 1(3), 615—616. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/412319-none-597cda7a.pdf
[3] Deviana. (2018). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Menurut Risk Based Bank Rating (Studi Pada Pt. Bank MNC International, Tbk Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2013). In Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB. https://jimfeb.ub.ac.id/index.php/jimfeb/article/view/4894
[4] Hafidhuddin, D. (2007). Agar harta berkah dan bertambah. Gema Insani.
[5] Hardi, J., & Fernos, J. (2008). Analisis NPL Dan LDR Pt. Bank Nagari Cabang Pembantu Tarusan Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan. 1—10.
[6] Juliana, H. (2021). Analisis faktor terhadap minat nasabah menggunakan tabungan wadiah barokah di bank syariah adam kota bengkulu. IAIN Bengkulu.
[7] Korompis, V. E., Rotinsulu, T. O., & Sumarauw, J. (2016). Analisis Perbandingan Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Berdasarkan Metode RGEC (Studi pada PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia Tbk dan PT. Bank Mandiri Tbk Tahun 2012-2014). Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 3(4).
[8] Lotus Mega Fortania & Ulfi Kartika Oktaviana. (n.d.). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Syariah Dan Unit Usaha Syariah Dengan Metode Camels Dan Rgec. 3(1), 118—126.
[9] Martani, D., Hidayat, T., Ningrum, A. S., & Maulana, T. I. (2017). Akuntansi Keuangan Lanjutan 1. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.
[10] Nangoy, E., Mangantar, M., & Van Rate, P. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Variabel Kesehatan Bank Menggunakan Metode RGEC Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Bank BUMN Periode 2012 — 2019. Jurnal EMBA : Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 10(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v10i2.39511
[11] Neldawaty, R. (2018). Perbandingan Kinerja Bank Syariah Dan Bank Konvensional. Journal Development, 6(1), 61—69. https://doi.org/10.53978/jd.v6i1.92
[12] Permana, B. A. (n.d.). “ Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Berdasarkan Metode CAMELS dan Metode RGEC .” 1—21.
[13] Pingkan. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Dengan Metode Rgec ( Risk Profile , Good Corporate Governance , Earning , Capital ) Pada Pt . Bank Mandiri ( Persero ) Periode 2015 - 2018. 20(4), 40—69.
[14] Rasjad, S. F. S. (2015). Pengaturan dan Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Perbankan. Lex et Societatis, III(3), 108—115.
[15] Rizqy Afrialdy, M., & Supriyanto, S. (2020). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan Menggunakan Metode Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning dan Capital pada Bank Yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2014-2016. Jurnal Kompetitif Bisnis, 1(2), 104—111. https://jkb.fisip.unila.ac.id/index.php/jkb/article/download/74/17/
[16] Romaningsih, D. S. (2022). Analisis Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Menggunakan Metode RGEC Pada Bank Swasta Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2019-2020 (Komparasi pada Masa Pandemi). Bisnis Dan Ekonomika, 2020. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/38164
[17] Sari, W., & Sadilah, D. N. (2021). Metode RGEC untuk Menganalisis Kesehatan Bank di Bank BRI Syariah. Jurnal Maps (Manajemen Perbankan Syariah), 5(1), 11—21. https://doi.org/10.32627/maps.v5i1.83
[18] Sipahutar, M. A. (2007). Persoalan-persoalan perbankan Indonesia. Niaga Swadaya.
[19] Wahasusmiah, R., & Watie, K. R. (2019). Metode Rgec : Penilaian Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Syariah. I-Finance: A Research Journal on Islamic Finance, 4(2), 170—184. https://doi.org/10.19109/ifinance.v4i2.3038
[20] Watung, R., & Ilat, V. (2016). Pengaruh Return on Asset (Roa), Net Profit Margin (Npm), Dan Earning Per Share (Eps) Terhadap Harga Saham Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2011-2015. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 4(2), 518—529.
[21] Wijaya, E. (n.d.). Analisis Pengaruh Net Interest Margin (Nim), Return On Asset (Roa), Return On Equity (Roe), Dan Capital Adequacy Ratio (Car) Terhadap Harga Saham Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Di Bursa Efek Indonesia Dalam Menentukan Investasi. 38—47.
