Qualitative Analysis of Organizational Culture and Its Implications for Educator Performance from a Positive Organizational Psychology Perspective

Authors

  • Fauzia Irfieh Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung image/svg+xml
  • Lilim Halimatul Madaniah Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung image/svg+xml
  • Hary Priatna Sanusi Sunan Gunung Djati State Islamic University Bandung image/svg+xml

Keywords:

Organizational Culture, Teacher Performance, Positive Organizational Psychology, Qualitative Research, Meaning Construction

Abstract

Efforts to improve educator performance often rely on structural approaches and material incentives, while the dimensions of meaning, values, and subjective experience within the school's organizational culture receive insufficient in-depth attention. This study aims to explore in depth how the construction of organizational culture—specifically values, rituals, narratives, and everyday practices—is understood, experienced, and made meaningful by educators, and how this meaning-making influences their motivation, engagement, and ultimately their performance. This research uses a qualitative phenomenological approach with a multi-site case study design in two senior high schools (one public and one private Islamic school) with distinct cultural characteristics. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 15 educators and school principals, participatory observation over four months, and document analysis. Data were analyzed thematically using the interactive model by Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña (2014). The research findings reveal three main themes: (1) "Culture as a Co-Constructed System of Meaning," where high performance emerges when core values (such as collaboration and appreciation) are communicated consistently and internalized through social rituals; (2) "The Gap Between Aspiration and Practice: A Fragmented Culture," where inconsistencies between espoused values and enacted values create cognitive dissonance and reduced work engagement; (3) "The Psychology of Interpersonal Space: Leadership as a Catalyst for Psychological Climate." Conclusion: Educator performance is not solely determined by individual factors but is profoundly influenced by the collective psychological climate shaped and maintained by the organizational culture. The effectiveness of culture lies in its ability to create coherence between symbolic meaning and everyday practical experience, which ultimately affects educators' commitment and psychological energy. Recommendations focus on the importance of a meaning-centered leadership approach in school management.

References

[1] Alharbi, J., & Alhadari, A. (2024). The role of ethical leadership in shaping organizational culture and teacher well-being in Islamic schools. International Journal of Educational Development, *108*, 102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.102975

[2] Argyris, C. (1977). Double loop learning in organizations. Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 115–125.

[3] Avey, J. B., & Penton, V. J. (2023). Psychological capital and beyond: Foundations of positive organizational scholarship (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

[4] Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Job Demands–Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, *34*(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695

[5] Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285.

[6] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.

[7] Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage.

[8] Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2021). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

[9] Chen, S., & Wang, H. (2022). How does school climate influence teacher innovative behavior? The mediating roles of psychological empowerment and professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, *116*, 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103751

[10] Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Ltd.

[11] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

[12] Dirani, K. M., Baldoni, S., & Nabhani, M. (2023). Leadership development in the Arab Middle East and North Africa: A review and future research agenda. Human Resource Development Quarterly, *34*(2), 135-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21485

[13] Eyal, O., & Roth, G. (2023). The principal’s sense of efficacy and its impact on school culture and teacher motivation: A meta-analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, *59*(1), 154-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X221124567

[14] Febrianto, N. F., Masruroh, S., & Hadi, S. (2021). Pengaruh budaya organisasi dan kepemimpinan transformasional terhadap kinerja guru melalui kepuasan kerja. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 45-59.

[15] Fernet, C., Trépanier, S.-G., & Austin, S. (2020). Motivational pathways of occupational and organizational turnover intention among newly registered nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, *76*(4), 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14294

[16] Ghani, B., & Jabeen, F. (2024). Authentic leadership, organizational virtuousness, and teacher engagement: A serial mediation model in Pakistani higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, *16*(1), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2023-0123

[17] Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.

[18] Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2020). Professional capital after the pandemic: Revisiting and revising classic understandings of teachers’ work. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, *5*(3/4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0039

[19] Hidayat, R., & Wijaya, C. (2022). The impact of servant leadership on teacher performance: The mediating role of organizational culture and job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, *60*(2), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-05-2021-0099

[20] Iqbal, A., & Asrar-ul-Haq, M. (2020). Creating a supportive culture for innovation and performance: The role of leadership and psychological safety. Journal of Organizational Change Management, *33*(5), 769-785. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2019-0345

[21] James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 1096–1112.

[22] Kemendikbudristek. (2021). Panduan implementasi program sekolah penggerak. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi.

[23] Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2023). Petunjuk Teknis Penguatan Budaya Mutu Madrasah Tahun 2023. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam.

[24] Lee, M., & Louis, K. S. (2023). Agency, structure, and school culture: Linking teachers’ professional learning to organizational change. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, *51*(1), 198-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220985191

[25] Li, L., & Yang, S. (2021). Linking transformational leadership and teacher commitment: A moderated mediation model of collective teacher efficacy and perceived organizational support. Social Psychology of Education, *24*(3), 815–837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09634-x

[26] Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

[27] Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological capital: An evidence-based positive approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 339–366.

[28] Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

[29] OECD. (2021). Positive, High-Achieving Students? What Schools and Teachers Can Do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3b9551db-en

[30] Ogbonnaya, C., & Babalola, M. T. (2021). How does collectivism shape the relationship between leadership and employee performance? Journal of Managerial Psychology, *36*(4), 360-375. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-08-2020-0438

[31] Owens, R. G., & Valesky, T. C. (2015). Organizational behavior in education: Leadership and school reform (11th ed.). Pearson.

[32] Pan, X., Chen, M., & Hao, Z. (2024). The effects of teachers’ psychological capital and growth mindset on their innovative teaching behavior: The moderating role of perceived organizational innovation climate. Frontiers in Psychology, *15*, 1306024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1306024

[33] Paterson, T. A., Luthans, F., & Jeung, W. (2022). Thriving at work: Impact of psychological capital and supervisor support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, *43*(5), 952–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2585

[34] Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.

[35] Raza, M. A., & Khan, M. M. (2023). Integrating Islamic spirituality into organizational behavior: A framework for enhancing employee well-being and performance in Muslim-majority contexts. Journal of Management, Spirituality & Religion, *20*(2), 145-167. https://doi.org/10.51327/OQPD9241

[36] Sari, D. P. (2022). Budaya organisasi sekolah dan dampaknya terhadap efektivitas kerja guru. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 29(1), 88-102.

[37] Schein, E. H. (2017). Organizational culture and leadership (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

[38] Setyaningrum, R. P., & Mukhtar, M. (2020). Budaya organisasi sehat sebagai prediktor kinerja guru. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 26(1), 34-42.

[39] Sisman, M. (2016). Organizational culture in schools. In M. Sisman (Ed.), Organizational culture (pp. 73-90). Springer.

[40] Skaalvik, C. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2021). Teacher burnout: Relations with dimensions of teacher self-concept and school context. Social Psychology of Education, *24*(4), 1065–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09643-w

[41] Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organizational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 339-358.

[42] TALIS. (2023). TALIS 2024 Conceptual Framework. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/talis-2024-conceptual-framework.pdf

[43] Wang, H., & Hall, N. C. (2021). Exploring the relations between teacher emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and commitment. Educational Psychology, *41*(6), 734–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2021.1917528

[44] Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.

[45] Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

[46] Yusuf, A., & Fauzi, A. (2024). Merdeka belajar and the challenge of cultural change in Indonesian schools: A policy implementation analysis. Journal of Education Policy, *39*(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2023.2254567

Published

2026-02-19

How to Cite

Irfieh, F., Madaniah, L. H., & Sanusi, H. P. (2026). Qualitative Analysis of Organizational Culture and Its Implications for Educator Performance from a Positive Organizational Psychology Perspective. JISMA: Journal of Social Sciences, Management and Accounting, 4(1), 1657-1680. https://melatijournal.com/index.php/jisma/article/view/708